Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6?

List posts in the topic

Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6?

msg# 1.2.1.1.1

depth:

4

Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2004/11/10 18:06

GIJOE    Posts: 4110

hi Jason.
Quote:

Sorry for the late reply, but may I ask, what exactly you don't like about the implementation? (natural curiosity)

This is the reasons:

- Unplanned enhancement eg) The type of date-time should not be 32bit integer.
- Double template system (It is only a weak point, now)
- Too many "echo" exist
etc...

But in Japan, there is a proverb like this:
"A worse child is more lovely"

I'll continue to develop this "lovely" module.

Votes:0 Average:0.00

Posts tree

• Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (noisia, 2004/10/9 11:54)
  • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/10/13 7:01)
    • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (noisia, 2004/10/13 10:32)
  • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (JasonMR, 2004/10/17 23:44)
    • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/10/19 19:40)
      • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (JasonMR, 2004/11/5 0:12)
        • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/11/10 18:06)
          • Re: piCal 0.60: Looking forward to new release (noisia, 2004/11/10 19:38)