Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6?

List posts in the topic

Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6?

msg# 1.2

depth:

1

Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2004/10/17 23:44

JasonMR    Posts: 14

Hey GI Joe!

Same as Marco, I first opted for Agenda, just because piCal was beta (and as stupid[human] as we/I are/am - it had a rather small number). What a stupid decision, as piCal is miles better!

And now you released it as stable::great news!

ThanX for your work, it is really appreciated.

Regards

Jason MR

Votes:0 Average:0.00

Posts tree

• Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (noisia, 2004/10/9 11:54)
  • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/10/13 7:01)
    • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (noisia, 2004/10/13 10:32)
  • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (JasonMR, 2004/10/17 23:44)
    • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/10/19 19:40)
      • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (JasonMR, 2004/11/5 0:12)
        • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/11/10 18:06)
          • Re: piCal 0.60: Looking forward to new release (noisia, 2004/11/10 19:38)