Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6?

List posts in the topic

Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6?

msg# 1.2.1

depth:

2

Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2004/10/19 19:40 | Last modified

GIJOE    Posts: 4110

hi Jason MR.

As I am not satisfied by the implementation of piCal, it is numbered as smaller than 1.0

My target point of piCal is much higher

Votes:0 Average:0.00

Posts tree

• Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (noisia, 2004/10/9 11:54)
  • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/10/13 7:01)
    • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (noisia, 2004/10/13 10:32)
  • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (JasonMR, 2004/10/17 23:44)
    • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/10/19 19:40)
      • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (JasonMR, 2004/11/5 0:12)
        • Re: piCal 0.60: Why do you call this Beta 0.6? (GIJOE, 2004/11/10 18:06)
          • Re: piCal 0.60: Looking forward to new release (noisia, 2004/11/10 19:38)