Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail

List posts in the topic

Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail

msg# 1.2.2.1.2.1.1

depth:

6

Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2006/5/26 4:55

GIJOE    Posts: 4110

Why not try the mode of url fopen() ?
Go to preferences of xhld.

Votes:0 Average:0.00

Posts tree

• Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (markpr, 2005/8/11 14:40)
  • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (markpr, 2005/8/11 15:04)
    • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (markpr, 2005/8/12 13:56)
      • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (GIJOE, 2005/8/15 16:54)
        • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (utahuser, 2005/8/17 11:44)
          • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (GIJOE, 2005/8/20 17:08)
            • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (markpr, 2005/8/23 3:33)
              • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (GIJOE, 2005/8/24 5:57)
      • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (utahuser, 2005/8/31 5:12)
      • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (utahuser, 2005/8/31 5:12)
        • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (utahuser, 2005/8/31 6:05)
  • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (utahuser, 2005/8/31 12:30)
    • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (melcahoon, 2005/9/1 2:12)
    • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (GIJOE, 2005/9/1 12:39)
      • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (josemoya, 2005/11/30 0:29)
        • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (ScottB, 2005/12/30 7:37)
        • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (GIJOE, 2006/5/2 13:01)
          • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (pixel, 2006/5/25 14:23)
            • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (GIJOE, 2006/5/26 4:55)
              • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (pixel, 2006/5/26 11:38)
                • Re: Xoops 2.2.1 and xhld 2.99/3.0 feeds fail (GIJOE, 2006/5/27 6:12)