PEAK XOOPS - Re: Better cloning process. in englishin japanese

Re: Better cloning process.

List posts in the topic

question Re: Better cloning process.

msg# 1.1
depth:
1
Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2005/3/9 6:34
GIJOE  ÀèǤ·³Áâ   Posts: 4110
hi sudhaker.

BETTER?
No.
it's just WORSE and behind the times.


It is a well-known method, and I'm not interested such an existing tecnique at all.
You can find such a feature in XF-Section or WebLinks.

This method causes some unexpected errors.


The most value of my DUPLICATABLE is fully same source code.

This feature is useful for source managiment.

I know the numbering in DUPLICATABLE V2.1 is not so welcomed.

Thus, I'll make DUPLICATABLE V3 full free naming dirname.

Of couse, all of duplicated modules are fully same source codes.
Votes:0 Average:0.00

Posts tree

  Advanced search


Login
Username or e-mail:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!