PEAK XOOPS - Re: I also modified the string pattern as following 
TOP
>
Forum
>
XOOPS Modules
>
piCal
>
[piCal] is this bug fixable?
>
Re: I also modified the string pattern as following
Re: I also modified the string pattern as following
Re: I also modified the string pattern as following
msg# 1.1.1.1
- depth:
- 3
Previous post
-
Next post
|
Parent
-
No child
|
Posted on 2004/10/13 6:09
GIJOE
Posts: 4110
Posts: 4110
hi cchiu.
As piCal can treat events which begins earlier than 1970 or later than 2037, I can't adopt your pattern.
eg) descirpting the birthday of John Lenon.
begin: 1940-10-9
end: 1940-10-9
recur: YEALY;BYMONTH=10;BYMONTHDAY=9;
This event a valid for now and then.
Quote:I don't think this check is necessary.
As piCal can treat events which begins earlier than 1970 or later than 2037, I can't adopt your pattern.
eg) descirpting the birthday of John Lenon.
begin: 1940-10-9
end: 1940-10-9
recur: YEALY;BYMONTH=10;BYMONTHDAY=9;
This event a valid for now and then.
Quote:
Wen using the recur rule:
if i have a "Until date" that is earlier than the 'Beginning Date' of the event. It still store in the database as a valid event. Is there any other way to check this case?
Votes:6
Average:5.00
Posts tree
-
[piCal] is this bug fixable?
(cchiu, 2004/9/11 16:10)
-
Re: [piCal] is this bug fixable?
(GIJOE, 2004/9/25 6:47)
-
I also modified the string pattern as following
(cchiu, 2004/10/9 17:18)
-
Re: I also modified the string pattern as following
(GIJOE, 2004/10/13 6:09)
-
-
-
Login