PEAK XOOPS - Re: Structural defect of XOOPS-2.3.2 from xoops.org in englishin japanese

Re: Structural defect of XOOPS-2.3.2 from xoops.org

Target News
Subject 本家版XOOPS 2.3.2の構造的欠陥
Summary 世界的にXOOPSの本家とは xoops.org ってことになり、本流は2.3系列って事になっているようです。そこの最新版である xoops-2.3.2b というアーカイブをダウンロードしてみてあきれました。htdocs/ の中に、xoops_lib というフォルダがあって、その中に、XOOPS_TRUST_PATH...

List posts in the topic

none Re: Structural defect of XOOPS-2.3.2 from xoops.org

msg# 1.2
depth:
1
Previous post - Next post | Parent - No child | Posted on 2009/1/13 13:32
GIJOE  先任軍曹   Posts: 4110
hi leco.

Quote:

Please, read this inside release_notes in pack xoops 232b:
I've just found it.
But this is not the point of the structural defect.
Just check the archive itself.
htdocs/
       mainfile.php
       (etc)
       xoops_lib/
                 modules/
                         protector
should be
htdocs/
       mainfile.php
       (etc)
xoops_lib/
          modules/
                  protector

Of course, "xoops_lib" sounds bad.
Perhaps, they cannot imagine how long I pondered the folder's name should be placed outside of DocumentRoot.

I've considered XOOPS_HIDDEN_PATH, XOOPS_OUTSIDE_PATH, DONT_PLACE_IT_IN_DOCROOT, and so on...

I finally determined the name as XOOPS_TRUST_PATH sice minahito suggested a good word "TRUST".


Quote:
Furthermore, they published a tutorial that explains how to remove the folders on htdocs.
All they have to do is just moving xoops_lib outside of htdocs.
(I also recommend they rename it into "xoops_trust_path")

After this, they can write a tutorial how to place xoops_lib inside htdocs for some hosting services don't allow to put files outside of htdocs.

Quote:
Obviously there are good modules as news, smartsections, article and xgal.
I cannot understand what you mean by this sentence.
Votes:14 Average:7.14

Posts tree

  Advanced search


Login
Username or e-mail:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!