PEAK XOOPS - Protector vs Core in englishin japanese

Protector vs Core

  • You cannot open a new topic into this forum
  • Guests cannot post into this forum
Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2007/6/18 0:16
Dave_L  ¾åÅùʼ From: Virginia, USA  Posts: 35
The XOOPS core developers have been discussing what to include in the XOOPS core for future releases.

Some of them think that important modules, such as Protector, should be included in the core distribution package. Others prefer that modules remain separate.

GIJOE, as the author of Protector, what's your opinion on this?
Votes:4 Average:10.00
Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2007/6/18 3:52
GIJOE  ÀèǤ·³Áâ   Posts: 4110
hi Dave.

Both XOOPS and my modules are under the license of GPLv2.

Thus, you can include any codes (even just a fragment) of Protector into XOOPS without problems.
And I knew some distribution packages of XOOPS with Protector as a module.


I had been asked the same question by Skalpa and Mithrandir
Votes:3 Average:10.00
Previous post - Next post | Parent - Children.1 | Posted on 2007/6/19 5:19
Dave_L  ¾åÅùʼ From: Virginia, USA  Posts: 35
Thanks
Votes:3 Average:10.00

none Re: Protector vs Core

msg# 1.1.1.1
Previous post - Next post | Parent - No child | Posted on 2007/6/19 20:06
Christian  ÆóÅùʼ From: Le Mans - France  Posts: 3
From Xoops 2.0.15 version,
on xoops France we distribute the version of xoops francized with the module protector.

I think that that would be better if the functionalities of the Protector module were integrated in the core xoops
Votes:4 Average:10.00

  Advanced search


Login
Username or e-mail:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!