PEAK XOOPS - Re: Fastest Cache Hack (Experimental version) 
Re: Fastest Cache Hack (Experimental version)
- As this forum is only for commentation, you cannot open a new topic
- Guests cannot post into this forum
| Target | Downloads |
| Subject | Fastest Cache Hack (Experimental version) |
| Summary | == THE FASTEST CACHE HACK for XOOPS ==SUMMARY:A hack for Page Caching of XOOPS.This hack is not for novices but for experts. USAGE:(1) copy fastestcache.php into your XOOPS_ROOT_PATH/include/(2) make a new folder out of DocumentRoot eg) /home/yourhome... |
mendow
From: Russian Moscow
Posts: 12
From: Russian Moscow
Posts: 12
Thank's for this hack.
But one question.
how much save resources, relative standard XOOPS?
But one question.
how much save resources, relative standard XOOPS?
Votes:5
Average:10.00
GIJOE
Posts: 4110
Posts: 4110
Just a case in this site:
Save 30% of CPU
Use another 30~50Mbyte HDD
Save 30% of CPU
Use another 30~50Mbyte HDD
Votes:1
Average:10.00
mendow
From: Russian Moscow
Posts: 12
From: Russian Moscow
Posts: 12
Thank's!
next question
Where can see this?
next question
// debug mode (you can see the hit ratio by counting fullcache/result)
define( 'FASTESTCACHE_DEBUG' , false ) ;Where can see this?
Votes:1
Average:10.00
GIJOE
Posts: 4110
Posts: 4110
you can see it in
XOOPS_TRUST_PATH.'/fullcache/result'
count each lines
XOOPS_TRUST_PATH.'/fullcache/result'
count each lines
Votes:1
Average:10.00
mendow
From: Russian Moscow
Posts: 12
From: Russian Moscow
Posts: 12
Hi !
how can one cut off any script or modules for hack fullcache?
thanks !
how can one cut off any script or modules for hack fullcache?
thanks !
Votes:1
Average:10.00
GIJOE
Posts: 4110
Posts: 4110
I can't understand what you mean.
explain with detail.
explain with detail.
Votes:1
Average:10.00
tl
Posts: 84
Posts: 84
Quote:
GIJOE: will the hack reduce the number of database queries? tl
Just a case in this site:
Save 30% of CPU
Use another 30~50Mbyte HDD
GIJOE: will the hack reduce the number of database queries? tl
Votes:1
Average:10.00
GIJOE
Posts: 4110
Posts: 4110
hi tl.
Quote:
Perhaps, 30% of queries are reduced.
Quote:
will the hack reduce the number of database queries?
Perhaps, 30% of queries are reduced.
Votes:1
Average:10.00
tl
Posts: 84
Posts: 84
Thanks GIJOE.
The reason for asking that was that when I enabled the hack, the number of queries was not reduced (according to a xoops logger I used). Although I did not test it for long.
My host limits the number of queries per hour. It would be of great help in reducing the number of queries. Xoops caching does not cache pagetitles so it is almost of no help.
I have some blocks cached, should I keep the block cache on while using the hack?
Thanks again,
tl
The reason for asking that was that when I enabled the hack, the number of queries was not reduced (according to a xoops logger I used). Although I did not test it for long.
My host limits the number of queries per hour. It would be of great help in reducing the number of queries. Xoops caching does not cache pagetitles so it is almost of no help.
I have some blocks cached, should I keep the block cache on while using the hack?
Thanks again,
tl
Votes:1
Average:10.00
GIJOE
Posts: 4110
Posts: 4110
Quote:If you runs XOOPS with appropriate block caches, FCH cannot reduce queries effectively.
Quote:Number of queries?
It's non-sense.
MySQL works quite fast with little and many queries.
Despite MySQL works slowly with big and few queries.
Quote:I think so.
The reason for asking that was that when I enabled the hack, the number of queries was not reduced (according to a xoops logger I used). Although I did not test it for long.
Quote:
My host limits the number of queries per hour. It would be of great help in reducing the number of queries. Xoops caching does not cache pagetitles so it is almost of no help.
It's non-sense.
MySQL works quite fast with little and many queries.
Despite MySQL works slowly with big and few queries.
Quote:
I have some blocks cached, should I keep the block cache on while using the hack?
Votes:1
Average:10.00
tl
Posts: 84
Posts: 84
Quote:
Don't laugh, yep, it is true. My host has a dedicated pool of MySQL servers but limits the number of queries per hour to prevent abuse, I guess. Other than the queries limit, I am very happy with the host. Well, if time comes, then I will have to move to a dedicated server.
Thanks for the quick answers. I think the block cache should be removed. First of all, the pages would be double-cached. There is no need for that as FCH is sufficient enough. Secondly, block cache might cause logging-in delays.
I had one block cache enabled and user login page " Thank for ... if ..., blah.. " was stuck for a quite long period of time before finally logging users in. The problem disappeared after the block cache was removed.
So far, FCH has been working great. Thank you for a great hack!
tl
Number of queries?
It's non-sense.
Don't laugh, yep, it is true.
My host has a dedicated pool of MySQL servers but limits the number of queries per hour to prevent abuse, I guess. Other than the queries limit, I am very happy with the host. Well, if time comes, then I will have to move to a dedicated server.Thanks for the quick answers. I think the block cache should be removed. First of all, the pages would be double-cached. There is no need for that as FCH is sufficient enough. Secondly, block cache might cause logging-in delays.
I had one block cache enabled and user login page " Thank for ... if ..., blah.. " was stuck for a quite long period of time before finally logging users in. The problem disappeared after the block cache was removed.
So far, FCH has been working great. Thank you for a great hack!
tl
Votes:3
Average:3.33
tl
Posts: 84
Posts: 84
GIJOE:
I assume the javascript is not affected by the cache. I have a page counter in javascript and it seems to be working fine under the cache.
Could you please confirm it? thanks.
tl
I assume the javascript is not affected by the cache. I have a page counter in javascript and it seems to be working fine under the cache.
Could you please confirm it? thanks.
tl
Votes:1
Average:10.00
GIJOE
Posts: 4110
Posts: 4110
hi tl.
Quote:It sounds naturally from the point of view of the FCH's mechanism.
Counters using JavaScript will work fine FCH.
Quote:
I assume the javascript is not affected by the cache. I have a page counter in javascript and it seems to be working fine under the cache.
Counters using JavaScript will work fine FCH.
Votes:7
Average:10.00
Login