PEAK XOOPS - Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2 
TOP
>
Forum
>
Comments
>
Downloads comment
>
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
>
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
| Target | Downloads |
| Subject | Protector 3.41 |
| Summary | = SUMMARY =Protector is a module to defend your CMS origined from XOOPS2 from various and malicious attacks.This module can protect a various kind of attacks like:- DoS- Bad Crawlers (like bots collecting e-mails...)- SQL Injection- XSS (not all though... |
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
msg# 1.1
- depth:
- 1
GIJOE
Posts: 4110
Posts: 4110
hi tl.
Quote:Independent each other.
Bad IPs for Protector is assumed former than XOOPS own.
Because Protector's bad IP does not need DB connection.
(You can see Protector's bad IP is much faster than XOOPS own)
Quote:Protector's bad IP system have to be FAST enough to estimate.
preg_match() is much expensive function than substr()+strlen().
(Though preg_match() is much faster than ereg()
)
Almost purpose will be achieved by describing '192.168.1.' etc.
Quote:
I assume Bad IPs are not confilicting with Xoops Own (?)
Bad IPs for Protector is assumed former than XOOPS own.
Because Protector's bad IP does not need DB connection.
(You can see Protector's bad IP is much faster than XOOPS own)
Quote:
Request: Any possibility of using the following format for bad IPs?
^123\.456\.8[1-9]\. or
^123.456.8[1-9].
preg_match() is much expensive function than substr()+strlen().
(Though preg_match() is much faster than ereg()
)Almost purpose will be achieved by describing '192.168.1.' etc.
Votes:3
Average:6.67
Posts tree
-
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
(tl, 2007/2/1 5:22)
-
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
(GIJOE, 2007/2/1 18:12)
-
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
(tl, 2007/2/2 3:53)
-
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
(GIJOE, 2007/2/2 5:05)
-
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
(tl, 2007/2/2 5:34)
-
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
(GIJOE, 2007/2/2 5:42)
-
Re: Xoops Protector 3.00beta2
(tl, 2007/2/2 6:45)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Login